To Contents

Grounded Theory

Hierarchical structure developed in the final study

HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURE

 

The following hierarchical structure was derived during the open and axial stages of the final study. The categories and subcategories displayed in the structure were used to assist in coding data obtained in the research around the core category identified in the phenomenon, 'the quality of learning'. Where possible variables have been assigned dimensions (a range of values).

Core category

1.0 The quality of learning

MAIN CATEGORIES

 

1.1 The student model

1.2 The learning materials

1.3 The learning environment

The main stakeholders in the phenomenon were identified as:

The learner

The tutor

The educational system

The following sets out the relationship between categories, sub-categories and variables developed in the final study.

To top

Core category

1.0 The quality of learning

MAIN CATEGORIES

1.1 The student model

1.2 The learning materials

1.3 The learning environment

The main stakeholders in the phenomenon were identified as:

The learner

The tutor

The educational system

The following sets out the relationship between categories, subcategories and variables developed in the final study.

To top

1.1 THE STUDENT MODEL

 

1.1.1 PERFORMANCE / RESULTS

Pretest/Posttest scores

(Baseline measure)

(High score Low score)

(Improvement measures)

On/Off computer tests

Comparison (same, equal, better)

On/Off computer tasks

Comparison (same, equal, better)

 

1.1.2 COMPONENTS OF THE STUDENT MODEL

Language

Level (High or Low)

Cognitive style

Verbaliser Bimodal Imager

Task level

Levels 1,2,3

Question level

Levels 1,2,3

Scaffolding HELP

Levels 1,2,3

1.1.3 CONFIGURING THE STUDENT MODEL

Configuring the descriptors in the model

Tutor involvement

(Highly involved Not involved)

Target setting

Adapting

Cooperative model

Alternative models and methods

automatic adaptation

The student

Prior skills

(rich in skills poor in skills)

Learner characteristics

Age

Gender

Learning difficulty

Other personal (not relevant)

Language

(good poor)

Cognitive style

(Verbaliser bimodal imager)

Intelligence

(IQ level)

Other personal characteristics

Learning styles

Learning strategies

Learner preferences

Motivation

Intrinsic motivation

Extrinsic motivation

(motivated not motivated)

Satisfaction with learning

Factors affecting perception

Interest

Success

(pass fail)

(high low score)

Context of learning

Relevance (perceived not perceived)

Vocational (in context out of context)

Learning (in context out of context)

Preferences (in context out of context)

Locus of control

Individual control

(controlled flexible)

Tutor control

(tutor controlled student controlled)

Control preference (highly controlled no control)

Flexibility (flexible controlled)

Objectives (known unknown)

Attitude (good poor)

Personal investment ( high low effort)

To top

1.2 THE LEARNING MATERIALS

1.2.1 SUBJECT CONTENT

Exam board considerations

Level

Performance criteria

Evidence

Accuracy

Security

1.2.2 DESIGN FEATURES

Quality

Text

Media

Script

Narrative

Content

Quality

Accuracy

Relevance

Context

Task type

Question type

Domain Level

Appropriateness

Technical features

Design

Sound

Video/animation

Interaction

Differentiation

Questions

Help/scaffolding

Task

Language

Cognitive style

Domain presentation

Screen design features

High quality poor quality

Look and feel

(appropriate not appropriate)

To top

1.2.3 USABILITY

Robustness of application

Navigation

Orientation

Location

Ease of use

Learnability

Information hiding

Cognitive load

Relationship between learning and usability

 

To top

1.2.4 LEARNING PRESENTATION STRATEGY

Collaborative working

Group work

Pair work

Working with the tutor

Individual work

Differentiation for the individual

The use of questions

related theory

The use of scaffolding

related theory

The use of tasks

related theory

Other materials involved in presentation of learning

Support material

Related materials

Other multimedia material

Quality

Availability

Integration

Theories of learning

Constructive

Cognitive influence

(Learner centred)

Instructive

Behaviourist influence

(Teacher centred)

Structure

Theory of design

Theories of instruction

Theories of learning

Support for mental models

Psychological factors aiding learning

Multimodal learning

Cognitive load

Challenge

Information feedback

Advanced organisers

Frames

Zone of proximal development

Questions and tasks used in learning

Achievement

Results

Exams

Assessments

Tests

Tasks

(pass rate)

(score)

Scaffolding and help used in learning

Individual configuration

(support challenge)

Personal achievement

Internal focus

External focus

Vocational focus

Student model in learning

Question level

challenge support

Task level

challenge support

Language support

clarity

Help/scaffolding

challenge support

Cognitive style

Verbaliser Bimodal Imager

Other cognitive or learning styles

To top

1.3 THE MANAGEMENT OF LEARNING

 

 

 

1.3.1 THE TUTOR

Tutor involvement

Integration

New methods

New roles

New skills

Assessment

Configuring the student model

Target setting

Team and group working methods

Tutor characteristics

Attitude

Training

Flexibility

Objectives

Personal investment

Rewards

Organisation

(highly organised not organised)

Control of learning

Configuration

Data logging

Assessment

Accreditation

To top

1.3.2 THE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT

1.3.2.1 The micro environment

Local provision of facilities

Network

Hardware

Software

Location

Learning centre

Library

Computer room

Classroom

Support

Technical

Learning

Direct support

Indirect support

Support staff

Support facilities

 

Quality of environment

Effect of environment on learning

Effect of learning on the environment

Light

Noise

Heat

Screen reflection

Space

Suitability of location

1.3.2.2 The macro environment

Strategic plan

Policy statement

ILT strategy

Central direction

Resources available

Central provision of facilities

Network

Hardware

Software

Support

Investment and allocation of resources

Competing influences

Other stakeholders

Needs analysis

Pressures

(real perceived)

Central involvement

Coordinators

Support teams

Course teams

Top-down approach

Bottom-up approach

Cost

Cost effectiveness

Cost benefit

Cost utility

Cost of falling behind

Cost efficiency

Funding opportunity

Cost of alternative strategies

Potential of commercial opportunities

Returns from increased student numbers

Returns from increased student retention

Reduction of staff replacement costs

 

Integration into existing systems

Flexibility

Flexible learning

Open learning

Distance learning

Effectiveness

Staff/Student Ratio

Pass rate

Retention

Recruitment

Training

Cost of training

Staff recruitment

Staff turnover

Staff satisfaction

Change

Revolution

Evolution

Managing change

 

Institutional objectives

Attitude

Publicity

Marketing

External influences

Inspection

Government recommendations

Funding bodies

External reports

Support organisations

To top

To Contents